About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-282373.3 1 (1999-08-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajjq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                               Comptroller General
                                                                  of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Vero Technical Services

         File:       B-282373.3; B-282373.4

         Date:       August 31, 1999


         George Sigler for the protester.
         Maj. Richard D. Desmond and Capt. Karen L. Deimler, Department of the Air Force,
         for the agency.
         Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest that proposal containing entries of NSP for two solicitation line items must
         be rejected as unacceptable is denied where solicitation did not require rejection of
         the offer; the NSP entries obligate the offeror to provide the required items.
         DECISION

         Vero Technical Services protests the award of a contract to C. Martin Company
         under request for proposals (RFP) No. F16602-99-R-0003, issued as a small business
         set-aside by the Department of the Air Force for the operation and maintenance of
         the Claiborne Bombing Range. The protester contends that C. Martin's proposal
         should have been rejected as unacceptable because it did not contain separate prices
         for each line item in Schedule B of the RFP. The protester also contends that
         C. Martin's price entries reflected an unfair competitive advantage based on special
         knowledge concerning the solicitation. Supplemental Protest, July 9, 1999, at 1.

         We deny the protest.

         The solicitation, issued on December 31, 1998, contemplated the award of a
         fixed-price requirements contract for a 1-year base period with four 1-year options.
         The RFP called for technical evaluation to determine conformance under
         enumerated areas and stated that award would be made to the responsible offeror
         whose offer conforms to the solicitation, is determined technically acceptable based
         on the evaluation criteria, and offers the lowest evaluated price, based on the total
         price for the base year and all options years. RFP § M-502. The RFP required that
         offerors submit an offer for all items listed in the schedule and further stated that

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most