About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-282277.2 1 (1999-07-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajjk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                              Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision




         Matter of: American Analytical & Technical Services, Inc.

         File:      B-282277.2

         Date:      July 16, 1999


         Robert J. Martinez, Esq., Williams & Jensen, for the protester.
         Kenneth R. Pakula, Esq., Environmental Protection Agency, for the agency.
         Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency properly did not reject bids as nonresponsive that failed to include prices for
         certain contract line items (CLIN) where prices were submitted for all of the sub-
         CLINs that comprised the CLIN, even though the solicitation suggested that prices
         should be submitted for the CLINs as well as the sub-CLINs.
         DECISION
         American Analytical & Technical Services, Inc. protests the agency's actions under
         invitation for bids (IFB) No. PR-HQ-98-00031, issued by the Environmental
         Protection Agency (EPA), for laboratory services. American contends that certain
         bids failed to properly complete the IFB pricing schedule and therefore should have
         been rejected as nonresponsive.

         We deny the protest.

         The IFB, issued July 22, 1998, was to procure multiple contractors under
         indefinite-quantity contracts to provide laboratory services to analyze samples from
         hazardous waste sites to determine the presence and concentration of certain
         organic analytes in aqueous and non-aqueous samples. IFB § B.1. As amended, the
         IFB allowed bidders to bid based on a maximum monthly capacity of 100 samples
         per month, 300 samples per month, or a combination of both. IFB amend. 3, § B-2.
         The IFB contemplated the award of 19 1-year contracts with two yearly options, with
         no more than 3 contracts to be awarded to one bidder, and with 9 of the contracts
         based on a 100-sample monthly capacity and 10 of the contracts based on a 300-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most