About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-281414 1 (1999-02-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajgr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: BiVAR & Associates, Inc.

             File:       B-281414

             Date:       February 5, 1999

             Donald E. Barnhill, Esq., Joan K Fiorino, Esq., and Valinda J. Astoria, Esq.,
             Douglas & Barnhill, for the protester.
             Maj. David Newsome, Department of the Army; and Denise Benjamin, Esq., Small
             Business Administration, for the agencies.
             Christina Sklarew, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Allegation by small business contractor performing under an interim contract that
             the Small Business Administration (SBA) failed to properly determine the adverse
             impact on the protester of accepting a contract requirement for the same services
             into the 8(a) program is denied where the protester merely disagrees with SBA's
             conclusion and does not show any violation of applicable regulations.
             DECISION

             BMAR & Associates, Inc. protests the decision by the Department of the Army and
             the Small Business Administration (SBA) to place request for proposals (RFP)
             No. DAKF19-98-R-0001 for maintenance and operations services in SBA's 8(a)
             business development program. BMAR, a small business contractor that has been
             performing these services on an interim basis since October 1997 through task
             orders placed under a previously awarded contract, contends that SBA did not
             properly analyze all relevant factors, as required by SBA regulations, in determining
             the adverse impact on BMAR from setting the requirement aside for the 8(a)
             pro gram.

             We deny the protest.

             Previously, by letter dated July 29, 1996, the Directorate of Contracting at Fort
             Riley, Kansas offered a requirement for maintenance and operations services for all
             non-medical electrical and mechanical equipment at the Fort Riley MEDDAC/
             DENTAC facilities and related energy plant to SBA for award under the 8(a)
             business development program. The SBA Wichita District Office determined that,
             because the requirement involved a new procurement, it would not be necessary to
             perform an adverse impact analysis, and concluded that the offering was suitable
             for acceptance under the program. Accordingly, SBA's Central Office accepted the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most