About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-281387 1 (1999-02-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajgo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: oComptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: OMV Medical, Inc.; Saratoga Medical Center, Inc. File: B-281387; B-281387.2; B-281387.3; B-281387.4 Date: February 3, 1999 Craig A. Holman, Esq., and Frank K Peterson, Esq., Holland & Knight, for OM Medical, Inc., and Norman J., Philion, Esq., Peter A. Greene, Esq., Edward V. Hickey, III, Esq., and Danielle E. Berry, Esq., Thompson, line & Flory, for Saratoga Medical Center, Inc., the protesters. Gary S. Pitchlynn, Esq., Pitchlynn, Morse, Ritter & Morse, for Choctaw Management/Services Enterprises, an intervenor. Clarence D. Long III, Esq., and Capt. David A. Whiteford, Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Agency reasonably evaluated awardee's proposal as posing a low performance risk based upon favorable reference information received concerning performance under relevant contracts. 2. Allegation that agency misevaluated awardee's proposal with respect to past performance is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and in accordance with the applicable stated evaluation factors. 3. Determination to select lowest priced technically acceptable proposal for award of contract, and determination that the awardee's prices were realistic are unobjectionable where both determinations were made in a manner consistent with the evaluation criteria, and the awardee's professional compensation plan and base salaries (which were higher than the protester's) reasonably were deemed adequate to recruit and retain employees. 4. Firm which submitted the third lowest priced proposal of six technically equal proposals is not an interested party to protest that the contracting agency improperly evaluated the awardee's proposal since, as provided by the solicitation,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most