About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-281228.2 1 (1999-04-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajfq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States

Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: H. Angelo & Company, Inc.

File:      B-281228.2

Date:      April 12, 1999



Michael C. Spring, Esq., Law Offices of David L. Swimmer, for the protester.
Maj. Susan D. Tigner, Department of the Army, for the agency.
Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and James Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Mistake in bid may not be corrected where the correction would result in the bid's
displacement of two lower bids and the amount of intended bid cannot be ascertained
from the bid and solicitation.
DECISION

H. Angelo & Company, Inc. protests an award to Robert Hall Associates, Inc. under
invitation forbids (IFB) No. DABT1O-98-B-0023, issued by the Department of the
Army for the installation of cross connection back flow prevention devices at Fort
Benning, Georgia. Angelo argues that the agency failed to allow it to correct its
mistake in bid so that its bid was not considered to be low.

We deny the protest.

The IFB anticipated the award of a fixed-price indefinite-quantity contract. IFB
§ L.10. The IFB bid schedule required bidders to insert unit and total prices for
574 individual contract line items (CLIN) in the base period (CLINs 0001-0185), option
year one (CLINs 1001-1185), and option year two (CLINs 2001-2204). Each CLIN
included a narrative of the item and its estimated quantity. The bid schedule also
required bidders to insert an estimated aggregate amount for the base period and
the two option periods, which would represent the total of all of the CLINs in each
period, and the total estimate aggregate of the base and option periods. The bid
schedule instructions required that bidders include unit prices for each CLIN and
stated that in the event of a discrepancy between a unit price and an extended price
the unit price would be considered to be the bid. IFB at B-1. The IFB provided that
bids would be evaluated for award by adding the prices for all options to the price for
the base period. IFB § L.21.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most