About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-281051.5 1 (1999-07-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajff0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                                  of the United States
United States General Accounting Office           DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                 GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                 approved for public release.
                                                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

         Matter of: Warvel Products, Inc.

         File:       B-281051.5

         Date:       July 7, 1999


         Thomas D. Myrick, Esq., Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, and Benjamin N. Thompson,
         Esq., Grady L. Shields, Esq., and Jennifer E. McDougal, Esq., Wyrick Robbins Yates &
         Ponton, for the protester.
         David W. Burgett, Esq., S. Gregg Kunzi, Esq., and Timothy D. Palmer, Esq., Hogan &
         Hartson, for Nightingale, Inc., an intervenor.
         Peter F. Pontzer, Esq., Federal Prison Industries, Department of Justice, for the
         agency.
         Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the
         preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Where a court ordered an agency to reevaluate proposals, the General Accounting
         Office in reviewing the reevaluation in response to a subsequent protest will not
         consider any matter that was or could have been decided by the court in its review.

         2. A protester's mere disagreement with an agency's evaluation conclusions does not
         demonstrate the unreasonableness of the agency's judgment, particularly where the
         agency's evaluation conclusions are supported by detailed narrative explanations
         and the protester does not show that the agency's findings were in error.

         3. Protest that an agency was predisposed to make award to the awardee is denied
         where the protester does not show that the agency's evaluation judgment or source
         selection was unreasonable and fails to provide credible evidence demonstrating
         bias.
         DECISION

         Warvel Products, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Nightingale, Inc. under
         request for proposals (RFP) No. 1PI-R-0939-98, issued by Federal Prisons Industries,
         Department of Justice, for ergonomic seating. Warvel challenges the agency's
         evaluation of proposals and source selection.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most