About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280766.5 1 (1999-12-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajeu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                               Comptroller General
                                                                  of the United States
United States General Accounting Office           DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                             The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                 GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                 approved for public release.

         Decision

         Matter of: E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc.

         File:       B-280766.5

         Date:       December 29, 1999


         Michael L. Sterling, Esq., and Howard W. Roth III, Esq., Vandeventer Black, for the
         protester.
         Capt. Joseph L. Fuller, and Maj. Frank A. March, Department of the Army, for the
         agency.
         Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest alleging that agency, in implementing recommendation in decision
         sustaining a protest, improperly reopened discussions with firm whose proposal had
         been eliminated from competitive range is denied where the firm's proposal had
         been recommended for elimination for award, but was not actually eliminated from
         the competitive range.

         2. Challenge to cost realism analysis is denied where, notwithstanding limited
         analysis performed by agency, protester has not identified any prejudicial flaw in
         analysis and record does not indicate any weakness in analysis prejudiced protester.

         3. Agency was not required to find awardee's proposed general and administrative
         rate unduly low where the rate was capped, and thus created no cost realism
         problem, and the rate was not so much lower than the firm's approved provisional
         rate as to require a finding that it created risk for the agency.
         DECISION

         E.L. Hamm & Associates, Inc. protests the proposed award of a cost-plus-award-fee
         contract to Computer Systems International, Inc. (CSI) by the Department of the
         Army, under request for proposals (RFP) No. DABT60-98-R-0014, for storage and
         warehouse services at the Army Training Support Center, Fort Eustis, Virginia. The
         award followed a reevaluation undertaken by the Army in response to an earlier
         protest, E.L. Hamm & Assocs., Inc., B-280766.3, Apr. 12, 1999, 99-1 CPD   85, against
         the award to Communication Technologies, Inc. (Comtek). We sustained Hamm's

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most