About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-281082 1 (1998-12-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahxy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: Omni Corporation

             File:       B-281082

             Date:        December 22, 1998

             Paul Shnitzer, Esq., Kenneth M. Bruntel, Esq., and Jeffrey E. Greene, Esq.,
             Crowell & Moring, for the protester.
             Lynda Troutman O'Sullivan, Esq., and Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Miller &
             Chevalier, for Ferguson-Williams, Inc., an intervenor.
             Matthew Keiser, Esq., and Charles A. Briggs, Esq., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
             for the agency.
             Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protest that agency conducted misleading discussions and improperly evaluated
             proposals during a competition to select the private-sector proposal upon which to
             base a cost comparison pursuant to Office of Management and Budget Circular
             No. A-76 is dismissed as premature where the protester files its challenge prior to
             the post-award debriefing offered by the agency at the conclusion of the
             administrative appeal process resolving the successful private-sector offeror's
             challenge to the agency's in-house cost estimate.

             2. Agencies are required to provide offerors who participate in the private-sector
             competition portion of the A-76 cost comparison process--but are not selected for
             comparison with the in-house offer--a debriefing on the results of the competition.
             DECISION

             Omni Corporation protests that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers treated Omni
             unfairly during the competition held pursuant to request for proposals (RFP)
             No. DACW66-98-R-0003 for the operation and maintenance of locks and dams on the
             Red River Waterway in Louisiana. The RFP was used to select a private-sector
             offer for comparison to the government's in-house cost estimate under Office of
             Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76. Omni argues that, among other
             things, the Corps misled it to increase its staffing (and thus its price) for these
             services, while the government's in-house estimate used a lower staffing level than
             Omni.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most