About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280959 1 (1998-12-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahxj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: General Security Services Corporation

             File:      B-280959; B-280959.4

             Date:      December 11, 1998

             James A. Hughes, Esq., Robert S. Brains, Esq., William E. Slade, Esq., and Rodney A.
             Grandon, Esq., Patton Boggs, for the protester.
             Donald E. Barnhill, Esq., and Joan K Fiorino, Esq., Douglas & Barnhill, for Akal
             Security, Inc., an intervenor.
             Joni M. Gibson, Esq., U.S. Marshals Service, for the agency.
             Andrew T. Pogany, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Contracting agency properly normalized pricing element of solicitation (wages of
             court security officers) where agency reasonably determined that security needs
             precluded permitting offerors to propose wages below the wages currently being
             paid to such personnel.
             DECISION

             General Security Services Corporation (GSSC) protests the terms of request for
             proposals (RFP) No. MS-98-R-0008, issued by the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS),
             Department of Justice, for court security services at eight Federal Circuits. GSSC
             principally argues that the RFP's price evaluation scheme unduly restricts
             competition.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP, issued on June 22, 1998, contemplates multiple awards (one award for
             each Federal Circuit) of indefinite-quantity, indefinite -delivery and time -and-material
             type contracts, with fixed unit prices. RFP § L-6. The RFP states that award will
             be made to that offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is
             determined to provide the best value to the government, cost/price, technical, and
             past performance considered. RFP § M-1. The RFP states that technical
             considerations are more important than price and that past performance is less
             important than technical or price considerations. RFP §§ M-5, M-6.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most