About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280772.2 1 (1998-12-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahwu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Massaro Company; Poerio Inc.

             File:       B-280772.2; B-280772.3

             Date:       December 4, 1998

             Joseph A. Massaro, Jr., Esq., for Massaro Company; and Keith L. Baker, Esq., and
             Jeffrey E. Weinstein, Esq., Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, for Poerio Inc., the
             pro testers.
             Kenneth B. MacKenzie, Esq., and Charlma Quarles, Esq., Department of Veterans
             Affairs, for the agency.
             Susan K McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency did not have a compelling reason to cancel solicitation after bid opening
             based upon allegedly ambiguous pricing requirements, where the solicitation, when
             read as a whole, is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation regarding how
             bidders were to structure their bids.
             DECISION

             Massaro Company and Poerio Inc. protest the cancellation after bid opening of
             invitation for bids (IFB) No. 9810 A/E, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs
             (VA) for the environmental improvement of three inpatient units at the VA Medical
             Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The protesters contend that, contrary to the
             agency's stated reason for canceling the IFB, the solicitation's pricing terms were
             not ambiguous; the protesters seek reinstatement of the canceled IFB.

             We sustain Poerio's protest and deny Massaro's protest for lack of prejudice.

             The IFB, issued on June 1, 1998, required bidders to provide prices (figures) for
             two bid items (items I and II, described below) and three alternates (described as
             minor additions or deletions to the IFB's performance requirements); a unit price
             for mine grouting also was required. The IFB provided, at § 01010,   1.2.A., the
             following descriptions:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most