About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280767.2 1 (1998-12-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahwt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Wilderness Mountain Catering

             File:       B-280767.2

             Date:       December 28, 1998

             R. Wade Curtis, Esq., Belnap, Curtis & Drozda, for the protester.
             Alan D. Groesbeck, Esq., Department of Agriculture, for the agency.
             John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Settlement agreement resolving prior contract dispute did not preclude agency, in
             its evaluation of protester's past performance, from considering protester's
             performance under the contract that was the subject of the dispute where the
             settlement agreement did not require agency to disregard contractor's performance;
             a condition to a settlement agreement that is not clearly set out in the language of
             the agreement will not be inferred.
             DECISION

             Wilderness Mountain Catering protests the exclusion of its proposal from the
             competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. 49-98-10, issued by the
             Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, for mobile food services.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP, issued on March 11, 1998, provided for multiple awards of fixed-price,
             indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, requirements contracts with 1-year base
             periods and four 1-year options. RFP at 2. The successful contractors under the
             RFP will be required to provide hot and cold meals and supplemental items at
             various locations during wildland fires and other activities throughout the
             contiguous western United States. RFP at 12.

             The RFP stated that awards would be made to the offerors submitting the proposals
             determined to be most advantageous to the government, and listed the following
             evaluation factors in descending order of importance: (a) Past Performance,
             (b) Equipment, (c) Ability to Understand and Perform the Work, and
             (d) Experience.1 RFP at 151. The RFP added that these non-price factors as


             1The ability to understand and perform the work evaluation factor included the
             following subfactors: organization, personnel, and capacity.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most