About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-280422.3 1 (1998-12-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahvj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: RTF/TCI/EAI Joint Venture

             File:       B-280422.3

             Date:       December 29, 1998

             Robert T. Findley for the protester.
             Craig E. Hodge, Esq., and Terese M. Harrison, Esq., Army Materiel Command, for
             the agency.
             Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Agency evaluation of protester's proposal and oral presentation is reasonable
             where it was performed in accordance with stated evaluation criteria and reflects
             valid criticisms of protester's proposed approach.

             2. Agency's source selection in which price was considered only in the competitive
             range determination, while improper, did not prejudice the protester where the
             awardee's proposal was evaluated as significantly superior to the protester's and the
             awardee's price was significantly lower than that proposed by the protester.
             DECISION

             RTF/TCI/EAI Joint Venture (RTF) protests the award of a contract to Earth Tech,
             Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAA09-97-R-0271, issued by the U.S.
             Army Industrial Operations Command, for the disposal and decontamination of
             government property at the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant (LHAAP). RTF
             argues that the agency's evaluation and award determination were flawed.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP, issued on October 10, 1997, sought fixed-price proposals on a commercial
             item basis (see Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12) for the liquidation of
             personal and installed property and, as necessary, decontamination of property
             prior to sale. The RFP included a statement of objectives (SO0) (Attachment 001)
             which outlined the essential tasks that each offeror was to address in its proposed
             scope of work. Offerors were expected to develop a scope of work with an
             innovative approach to satisfy the government's SOO requirements. As set forth in
             the SOO synopsis, the 24-month work effort consisted of: explosive contamination
             coding; assessing personal property and marketable installed property market value;
             assessing installed real property salvage value; developing a marketing plan

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most