About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-279723 1 (1998-07-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahtm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Riveer Company

             File:      B-279723

             Date:      July 14, 1998

             Matt Petter for the protester.
             Joshua A. Kranzberg, Esq., and Laurence M. Smail, Esq., Department of the Army,
             for the agency.
             Adam Vodraska, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Contracting agency reasonably evaluated protester's proposal as technically
             unacceptable for failing to meet material solicitation requirements and properly
             excluded the proposal from the competitive range because the proposal would
             require major revisions to become acceptable.
             DECISION

             Riveer Company protests the rejection of its proposal and the award of a contract
             to The Centech Group, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAH1O-98-R-
             0004, issued by the U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, Aviation Applied
             Technology Directorate, Fort Eustis, Virginia, for a prototype aircraft cleaning
             and deicing system (ACDS). The prototype ACDS will be used for operational
             evaluation by the contracting agency to establish the requirements for a production
             model ACDS.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP, issued February 11, 1998, as a total small business set-aside under the
             commercial item procedures of FAR part 12, contemplated the award of a fixed-
             price contract to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation
             represents the best value to the government, price, technical and past performance
             factors considered. RFP at 1, 10, 19. The technical factor was of paramount
             importance and price was more important than past performance. RFP at 19.
             According to the RFP, proposals would be evaluated under the technical factor to
             assess whether the proposed ACDS will likely meet the minimum government
             requirements. Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most