About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-279707 1 (1998-07-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahtj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision Matter of: HSQ Technology File: B-279707 Date: July 9, 1998 Donald 0. Pratt, Esq., Pratt & Sanderford, for the protester. Christopher M. Bellomy, Esq., Arthur F. Thibodeau, Esq., and George N. Brezna, Esq., Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for the agency. Christina Sklarew, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protester's proposal was properly excluded from the competitive range as not having a reasonable chance of being selected for award in view of agency's receipt of significantly higher-rated proposals; protester's proposal lacked information showing satisfaction of experience requirements by proposed key personnel even after agency requested, in two rounds of discussions, that the required information be provided. DECISION HSQ Technology protests the elimination of its proposal from the competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. N47408-97-R-1806, issued by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command for a supervisory control and data acquisition system to be known as the Pier Power Monitoring/Utility Control System. HSQ contends that the Navy misevaluated HSQ's proposal and improperly eliminated the proposal from the competitive range. We deny the protest. The RFP was issued on January 6, 1997 for a predominantly electrical system to be configured as a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system for the Naval Station in San Diego, California. The requirement is to provide, install, maintain, repair, replace, and test systems that will monitor, control, analyze, and provide historical and billing information for certain utility services. The RFP contemplated the award of an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with provisions for both fixed-price and cost-reimbursable pricing. Award was to be made on the basis of best value to the government. The RFP set forth the following five general evaluation factors: technical; past performance; cost; subcontracting; and software license agreement. The technical

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most