About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-279665 1 (1998-07-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahth0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.




             Matter of: Technical Support Services, Inc.

             File:       B-279665; B-279665.2

             Date:       July 8, 1998

             Jonathan M. Bailey, Esq., Theodore M. Bailey Law Office, for the protester.
             Rexford T. Bragaw, III, Esq., Defense Commissary Agency, for the agency.
             Peter A. Jannicelli, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest is sustained where the agency disregarded the solicitation's stated best
             value evaluation scheme and awarded the contract to the offeror of the
             lowest-priced, technically acceptable proposal without weighing the awardee's low
             price against the benefits potentially associated with the protester's higher-rated
             proposal.
             DECISION

             Technical Support Services, Inc. (TSSI) protests the Defense Commissary Agency's
             (DCA) award of a contract for commissary services to Ace Services, Inc., pursuant
             to request for proposals (RFP) No. DECA01-98-R-0005. TSSI contends that the
             agency failed to inform it, either in the RFP or during discussions, that the contract
             was going to be awarded to the offeror of the lowest-priced, technically acceptable
             proposal. TSSI also contends that DCA did not evaluate proposals and select the
             awardee in accord with the RFP's stated evaluation scheme, and that DCA
             unreasonably induced it to increase its staffing levels and its associated prices
             during discussions and then improperly awarded the contract to Ace on the basis of
             its lowest-priced proposal. TSSI also alleges that the agency failed to conduct a
             meaningful price realism analysis of Ace's offer.1 Initial Protest at 4; Supplemental
             Protest at 1, 11-12.


             1In its initial protest, TSSI also alleged that, during discussions, the agency did not
             allow it to address negative information DCA received regarding TSSI's past
             performance. The agency report on the initial protest included a detailed response
             to this allegation, but TSSI did not reply to the agency's response. We therefore
             consider the issue abandoned. Trijicon. Inc., B-244546, Oct. 25, 1991, 91-2 CPD
             T 375 at 4 n.3.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most