About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-279260 1 (1998-05-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahsb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Conwal, Inc.

             File:       B-279260; B-279260.2

             Date:       May 26, 1998

             J. Patrick McMahon, Esq., McMahon, David & Brody, for the protester.
             Gerald H. Werfel, Esq., Pompan, Murray, Ruffner & Werfel, for Analytical Sciences,
             Inc., an intervenor.
             Michael Colvin, Department of Health & Human Services, for the agency.
             Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Even if the protester's allegations with respect to the reasonableness of the agency's
             evaluation of the awardee's cost proposal had merit, the protester has failed to
             show that it was prejudiced by the agency's evaluation of the awardee's proposed
             c o sts.
             DECISION

             Conwal, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Analytical Sciences, Inc. (ASI)
             under request for proposals (RFP) No. 200-97-0610(P), issued by the Department of
             Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and
             Prevention, for the development, identification, collection, and dissemination of
             disease prevention communication and information materials through the operation
             of a Prevention Information Network. Conwal challenges the reasonableness of the
             agency's evaluation of ASI's cost proposal.

             We deny the protests.

             The RFP contemplated the award of a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for the base
             period and four 1-year option periods. The RFP provided that the award would be
             made to the offeror whose integrated proposal (technical proposal, business
             proposal, oral presentation materials, past performance information, responses to
             sample tasks, and best and final offer (BAFO)) offered the highest technical merit at
             the best overall value to the government. The RFP also provided that where
             competing proposals were determined to be substantially equal, past performance
             and/or cost would become controlling factors.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most