About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278793 1 (1998-03-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahqe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: Coleman Research Corporation

             File:       B-278793

             Date:        March 16, 1998

             James S. Roberts, Jr., Esq., Townes, Woods & Roberts, P.C., for the protester.
             James J. McCullough, Esq., Joel R. Feidelman, Esq., and James S. Kennell, Esq.,
             Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, an intervenor.
             Craig E. Hodge, Esq., and Diane V. Beam, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
             agency.
             Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. In conducting a cost realism analysis under a negotiated procurement for a
             follow-on cost reimbursement contract, procuring agency reasonably applied the
             protester's overhead rate from the predecessor contract, instead of the protester's
             significantly lower proposed rate, where protester's proposal failed to adequately
             support or justify the newly proposed rate.

             2. Under solicitation which provided that cost was significantly less important than
             technical considerations, award to offeror with superior technical proposal and
             slightly higher most probable cost is unobjectionable where source selection
             authority reasonably determines that the lower cost associated with protester's
             proposal does not outweigh the technical superiority of awardee's proposal.
             DECISION

             Coleman Research Corporation protests the award of a contract to Science
             Applications International Corporation (SAIC) under request for proposals (RFP)
             No. DAAHO1-97-R-0172, issued by the Department of the Army for support services
             concerning weapon systems effectiveness analysis. Coleman challenges the
             propriety of the agency's upward adjustment of Coleman's most probable cost and
             the soundness of the agency's cost/technical tradeoff.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most