About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278700 1 (1998-03-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahpv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Universal Coatings, Inc.

             File:       B-278700

             Date:       March 4, 1998

             Peter J. Ippolito, Esq., Iillyer & Irwin, for the protester.
             Joseph J. Cox, Esq., and Pat M. Falcigno, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
             agency.
             Charles W. Morrow, Esq. and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Bid bond which mistakenly included language that stated that payment on the bond
             was contingent upon the bidder entering into the identified contract, instead of the
             standard condition that payment is contingent on the bidder submitting the bid on
             the identified solicitation, is nevertheless clearly enforceable against the surety in
             the event the bidder declines to execute the contract and provide acceptable
             performance and payment bonds, in view of the fact that the bond otherwise made
             clear the surety's intent to be bound.
             DECISION

             Universal Coatings, Inc. protests the rejection of its bid under invitation for bids
             (IFB) No. DACA51-97-B-0043, issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
             for reroofing certain buildings at the Defense Logistics Agency Depot, Warren, Ohio.
             Universal contends that the Corps improperly determined its bid to be
             nonresponsive due to a defective bid bond.

             We sustain the protest.

             Section 000700, paragraph 105, of the IFB required each bidder to submit a bid
             guarantee, in the form of a bid bond or other security, in the amount of 20 percent
             of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less, and noted that the failure to
             furnish a bid guarantee on a standard form (SF) 24 in the proper form and amount
             by the time set for opening of bids may be cause for rejection of a bid. Paragraph
             109 of the same section required the contractor to furnish a performance bond on
             SF 25 and a payment bond on SF 25A within 10 days of award.

             At bid opening, the Corps received 14 bids. Universal submitted the low bid of
             $818,500, which was accompanied by a bid bond issued by Amwest Surety
             Insurance Company on an SF 24-type form generated by the surety's bonding agent.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most