About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278698 1 (1998-03-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahpu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Pacific Photocopy and Research Services

             File:       B-278698; B-278698.3

             Date:       March 4, 1998

             Bernard Dane Stein, Esq., for the protester.
             Harry D. Lewis, Esq., for Judicial Research and Retrieval Services, Inc., the
             interveno r.
             Roberta M. Echard, Esq., Administrative Office of the United States Courts, for the
             agency.
             John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency reasonably determined that the prior experience and past performance of
             the awardee of two license agreements for photocopying services were acceptable,
             and, consistent with the solicitations' evaluation criteria, made award based on the
             awardees' low prices.
             DECISION

             Pacific Photocopy and Research Services protests the award of two license
             agreements to Judicial Research and Retrieval Services, Inc., under requests for
             quotations (RFQ) issued by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts
             for off-site copy centers.

             We deny the protests in part and dismiss them in part.

             The two RFQs provided for the award of 2-year, revocable, non-exclusive license
             agreements for providing off-site copy services to the public in Fort Lauderdale and
             West Palm Beach, Florida. The RFQs required, among other things, that vendors
             have certain specified equipment, and set forth estimated quantities of services to
             be performed during each year of the agreements. The RFQs stated that the
             license agreement[s] will be awarded to the responsible vendor who offers the
             lowest price and is deemed acceptable in the areas of experience and prior
             performance. To facilitate this evaluation, the RFQs required that each vendor
             provide three references for whom the vendor has provided similar services, and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most