About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278223 1 (1998-01-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahnm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: BFI Waste Systems of Nebraska, Inc.

             File:       B-278223

             Date:       January 8, 1998

             Kevin Rauber for the protester.
             Gary L. Young, Esq., Keating, O'Gara, Davis & Nedved, for Environmental Health
             Systems, Inc., an intervenor.
             Jane S. Converse, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
             Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency's evaluation of offeror's past performance is unobjectionable where alleged
             deficiencies in past performance were reasonably assessed by the agency as having
             no negative impact on offeror's otherwise excellent past performance record.
             DECISION

             BFI Waste Systems of Nebraska, Inc. protests the award of a contract to
             Environmental Health Systems, Inc. (EHS) under request for proposals (RFP)
             No. 636-1-98, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs. BFI challenges the
             agency's evaluation of EHS' past performance.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP contemplated award of a fixed-price contract for pickup, transportation,
             and disposal of infectious medical waste from the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers
             (VAMC) in Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska. Proposals were to be evaluated on the
             basis of quality (40 points), past performance (30 points), and price (30 points).
             Award was to be made to the offeror whose proposal was evaluated as most
             advantageous to the government.

             For evaluation purposes, offerors were required to submit specific information with
             regard to the first two evaluation factors. As to quality, offerors were to submit
             statements as to: whether the offeror was in compliance with Department of
             Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and Occupational
             Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) regulations, along with the date or copy of the
             offeror's license, permit, or certificates; quality management programs or training
             programs in effect and whether in-service and other continual training is provided
             to employees; and programs or training available for reduction of contaminated

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most