About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278205 1 (1998-01-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahnj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: The Lisle Company

             File:       B-278205

             Date:       January 6, 1998

             Christopher L. Meacham, Esq., Meacham & Earley, P.C., for the protester.
             Donald M. Conner for Conner Brothers Construction Company, Inc., an intervenor.
             William A. Hough, Esq., and Gregory W. Vanagel, Esq., Department of the Army, for
             the agency.
             Robert Arsenoff, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protest challenging the acceptance of a modified bid on the basis that the
             modification rendered the intended price ambiguous is denied where the bid
             remains low under any interpretation of the modification.

             2. Allegation that agency accepted a late bid modification is denied where it is
             based on speculation and is essentially contradicted by the record.
             DECISION

             The Lisle Company protests the award of a contract to Conner Brothers
             Construction Company, Inc., under invitation for bids (IFB) No. DACA21-97-B-0053,
             issued by the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, for the construction of a
             rail loading facility at Fort Benning in Georgia. Lisle maintains that the agency
             improperly accepted a modification to Conner's bid.

             We deny the protest.

             BACKGROUND

             The IFB, issued on August 26, 1997, called for a base bid consisting of nine line
             items, Nos. 0001 through 0009, with additive work included in line item Nos. 0010
             through 0013. The bid schedule required bidders to enter five totals as follows:
             base bid; base bid plus additive No. 1; base bid plus additives Nos. 1 and 2; base bid
             plus additives Nos. 1 through 3; and base bid plus additive items Nos. 1 through 4.
             The IFB provided that the low price would be calculated by determining which bid
             offered the lowest aggregate amount for the . . . base bid . . . plus . . . (in the order
             stated in the list of priorities in the bid schedule) those additive . . . items that

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most