About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277801.4 1 (1998-06-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahmm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.

             File:       B-277801.4

             Date:       June 1, 1998

             Cyrus E. Phillips IV, Esq., and Christopher H. Jensen, Esq., Kilcullen, Wilson &
             Kilcullen, for the protester.
             Stuart I. Young, Esq., DynCorp EENSP, Inc., an intervenor.
             Gena E. Cadieux, Esq., and Beth Kelly, Esq., Department of Energy, for the agency.
             Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protester's contention that one of its evaluated weaknesses was double-counted
             under one of two personnel subcriteria is upheld where the record shows that the
             protester's proposal was downgraded under the subcriterion for a matter not
             reasonably within the scope of the subcriterion, and where the other personnel
             subcriterion clearly indicated an intent to consider this matter, and reasonably did
             SO.

             2. Argument that evaluation of past performance was unreasonable because none
             of the protester's properly-identified references returned the past performance
             questionnaire is denied where the agency followed the procedure identified in the
             solicitation of awarding a neutral rating for such unreturned references, and where
             there is no showing that the evaluators had some independent basis for knowing of
             the protester's allegedly excellent past performance, because, absent such a
             showing, there is no legal requirement that all past performance references be
             included in a valid review of past performance.

             3. Where record shows that the protester cannot reasonably claim that, but for the
             agency's actions, it would have had a substantial chance of receiving the award, the
             General Accounting Office will not sustain a protest, even though, in some areas,
             the contentions raised have merit.
             DECISION

             Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. (ADC) protests the award of a contract to DynCorp
             EENSP, Inc., d/b/a DynMeridian by the Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to
             request for proposals (RFP) No. DE-RPO1-97NN50008, issued to procure technical,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most