About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-276846.2 1 (1998-02-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahlw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Kongdan Kumnan Restaurant/Good Food Service

             File:       B-276846.2

             Date:       February 23, 1998

             John E. Gagliano, Esq., Cohen, Gettings, Dunham & Davis, P.C., for the protester.
             Col. Nicholas P. Retson, Maj. Jonathan C. Guden, and Maj. Nathanael Causey,
             Department of the Army, for the agency.
             Sylvia Schatz, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency properly rejected protester's proposal for failure to establish local (Korean)
             source status as required by solicitation, where claimed local status was based on
             United States firm's consulting agreement with local Korean company, and agency
             reasonably determined that agreement showed U.S. firm, not Korean company,
             would have control and principal responsibility for performance of the contract.
             DECISION

             Kongdan Kumnan Restaurant/Good Food Service (KKR/GFS) protests the rejection
             of its proposal, under the Department of the Army request for proposals (RFP) No.
             DAJB03-96-R-0098, for food service operations at Army dining facilities in the
             Republic of Korea (ROK).

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP contemplated the award of a fixed-price contract to the lowest-priced,
             technically acceptable offeror for a base year, with four 1-year options. Section L
             of the RFP, relating to the local source requirement, provided:

                   All sources may submit a proposal, however, the ROK-US SOFA
                   prohibits the U.S. from granting invited Contractor status if a fair and
                   reasonable, technically acceptable offer is received from a responsible
                   local source. Should this occur, the Government would then consider
                   for award only those offerors that have shown authorization and
                   capability to compete and perform as a local source. Any U. S.
                   Contractor with capacity to qualify as a local source must submit such
                   documentation in the initial proposal. If a U.S. contractor provides
                   such documentation in the initial proposal, it may submit a price
                   proposal as an invited contractor and as a local contractor.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most