About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-278139 1 (1997-12-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagex0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: The ENDMARK Corporation

             File:       B-278139

             Date:       December 31, 1997

             Robert M. Cambridge, Esq., for the protester.
             Laurie A. Dzien, Esq., Naval Air Systems Command, for the agency.
             Sylvia Schatz, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Where solicitation requirements--for example, requirement that offerors submit a
             list of all of their subcontractors' support services contracts currently being
             performed or completed within the last 3 years (limited to a minimum of
             20 contracts for large business subcontractors)--are deemed necessary by the
             agency to assess offerors' capabilities, and the requirements in fact are aimed at
             enabling the agency to make such an assessment, the requirements reflect the
             agency's needs and do not improperly restrict competition.

             2. Experience requirements do not exceed agency's needs where they are directly
             related to the work to be performed under the solicitation.
             DECISION

             The ENDMARK Corporation protests the terms of Department of the Navy request
             for proposals (RFP) No. N00019-97-R-0046, issued as a small business set-aside for
             analysis and technical studies, engineering and technical services, and management
             and professional services. The protester contends that certain requirements in the
             RFP exceed the agency's needs and unduly restrict competition.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP contemplated the award of an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity
             contract on a best value basis for a 1-year base period, with four 1-year options.
             The RFP set forth the following three evaluation factors: (1) technical, (2) price
             and cost realism, and (3) past performance. The RFP listed three technical
             subfactors--personnel experience, sample tasks, and management plan--and two past
             performance subfactors--past contracts and key personnel.

             For evaluation under the past contracts subfactor under the past performance
             factor, offerors were required to provide a list of their subcontractors' support

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most