About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277917 1 (1997-12-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagea0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. It has been approved for public
                                                    release.



             Matter of: Magnum Products, Inc.; Amida Industries, Inc.

             File:       B-277917; B-277917.2; B-277917.4

             Date:        December 8, 1997

             William E. Hughes III, Esq., Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek S.C., for Magnum Products,
             Inc., and Irvin V. Plowden, Jr., for Amida Industries, Inc., the protesters.
             Alexander J. Brittin, Esq., and Suzanne L. Karbarz, Esq., McKenna & Cuneo, L.L.P.,
             for T & J Manufacturing, Inc., an intervenor.
             Joseph Summerill, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Prison Industries, for
             the agency.
             Susan K McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Agency's determination that protester's revised proposal remained technically
             unacceptable after discussions, and that the proposal should be eliminated from
             further consideration for award, was proper where the agency reasonably concluded
             that the proposal would require major revision in order to become acceptable and
             the record shows that, in light of overall technical inferiority and higher price of its
             proposal, protester did not have a reasonable chance of receiving award.

             2. Protest that awardee fails to comply with solicitation's experience requirements
             is denied where solicitation did not expressly prohibit offerors from relying on
             proposed subcontractors to meet the requirements and awardee's proposal shows
             that proposed major subcontractor has required experience.
             DECISION

             Magnum Products, Inc. and Amida Industries, Inc. protest the award of a contract
             to T & J Manufacturing, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. 1PI-R-0613-97,
             issued by the Department of Justice, Federal Prison Industries (FPI) for portable
             floodlight systems and related support services. Magnum protests that the agency's
             exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range was unreasonable; both
             Magnum and Amida challenge the award to T & J.


We deny the protests.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most