About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277768 1 (1997-11-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagdq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision






             Matter of: Nomura Enterprise, Inc.

             File:       B-277768

             Date:       November 19, 1997

             Al Weed, Esq., for the protester.
             Joel R. Feidelman, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, for Defense
             Research Incorporated, an intervenor.
             Vera Meza, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
             John Van Schaik, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Where an agency uses a traditional responsibility factor, such as past
             performance, as a technical evaluation factor, the comparative evaluation of
             proposals under such factor does not involve a matter of responsibility subject to
             the Small Business Administration's certificate of competency procedures.

             2. In a negotiated, best value procurement, an agency may select a higher-rated,
             higher-priced proposal for award, where the agency reasonably determines in
             accordance with the stated evaluation criteria that the technical superiority of the
             higher-rated proposal outweighs the price advantage of the lower-rated proposal.
             DECISION

             Nomura Enterprise, Inc. protests the award of a firm, fixed-price contract to
             Defense Research Incorporated under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAA09-97-
             R-0126, issued by the Department of the Army for a quantity of missile warhead
             metal parts. Nomura challenges as unreasonable the Army's decision to award to
             Defense at a significantly higher price than Nomura offered. Nomura contends that
             the agency's selection decision was based on the firm's low past performance
             evaluation rating, which Nomura maintains essentially constituted a
             nonresponsibility determination that the agency should have referred to the Small
             Business Administration (SBA) for the possible issuance of a certificate of
             competency (COC).


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most