About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277497 1 (1997-10-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagcl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Vistron, Inc.

             File:       B-277497

             Date:       October 17, 1997

             Allan Johnson for the protester.
             Col. Nicholas P. Retson and Capt. Bryant S. Banes, Department of the Army, for the
             agency.
             Robert C. Arsenoff, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Protest that agency failed to evaluate and consider the alleged technical superiority
             of a proposal for a commercial item is denied where the solicitation did not include
             any technical evaluation factors and it is clear that award was to be made on the
             basis of low price.
             DECISION

             Vistron, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Paging Network of Philadelphia
             (Pagenet) under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAKF29-97-R-0011, issued by the
             Department of the Army for the lease of pagers and related services. Vistron
             alleges that the agency improperly failed to consider the technical superiority of
             Vistron's proposal and instead made award on the basis of low price.

             We deny the protest.

             The requirement at issue was originally solicited by the Army under invitation for
             bids (IFB) No. DAKF29-97-B-0009, which was canceled on January 17, 1997,
             because all bidders had failed to acknowledge an amendment. Thereupon, the
             procurement was converted to competitive negotiation procedures under RFP
             No. DAKF29-97-R-0006 (R-0006).

             Proposals under R-0006 were submitted by January 29. On February 3, Vistron was
             informed that its prices were too high, that it needed to sign a procurement
             integrity certification, and that best and final offers (BAFO) were due on
             February 12. Three amendments were issued to R-0006 in response to questions
             submitted by Vistron. Amendment 0001, issued on February 7, deleted three line
             items; amendment 0002, issued on February 10, postponed BAFOs indefinitely; and
             amendment 0003, issued on February 20, revised the schedule and set March 6 as
             the new closing date for BAFOs.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most