About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277391 1 (1997-09-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagce0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: The Charles E. Smith Companies

             File:       B-277391

             Date:       September 25, 1997

             Mary Beth Bosco, Esq., James A. Hughes, Esq., Lynn T. Burleson, Esq., and
             Rodney A. Grandon, Esq., Patton Boggs, L.L.P., for the protester.
             Ronald R. Raider, Esq., Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, for Hoffman Family Limited
             Partnership; Robert E. Gregg, Esq., Hazel & Thomas, P.C., for Commonwealth
             Atlantic Properties, Inc.; and R. William Hard, for LCOR Incorporated, the
             interveno rs.
             Barry D. Segal, Esq., and Jeffrey M. Hysen, Esq., General Services Administration,
             for the agency.
             Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the
             preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             In a procurement for leased office space where the solicitation contemplated a
             two-phase proposal submission and evaluation process, an offeror may not wait to
             protest the terms of the solicitation until it learns that its phase I proposal was
             acceptable and that it was selected to submit a phase II technical and design
             proposal where the alleged improprieties in the terms of the solicitation were
             apparent prior to the closing time for receipt of phase I proposals.
             DECISION

             The Charles E. Smith Companies protests the terms of solicitation for offers (SFO)
             No. 96.004, issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) for the long-term,
             consolidated headquarters space requirements for the Patent and Trademark Office
             (PTO). The protester, the incumbent lessor which is offering the site of its existing
             buildings, basically contends that the technical specifications and other terms of the
             SFO are defective as they unduly favor newly constructed buildings.

             We dismiss the protest.




             1Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, First Crystal Park Associates Limited
             Partnership, Second Crystal Park Associates Limited Partnership, Third Crystal Park
             Associates Limited Partnership, and Alder Branch Realty Limited Partnership are
             collectively known as The Charles E. Smith Companies.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most