About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277326 1 (1997-09-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagbv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.



             Matter of: Microcosm, Inc.

             File:       B-277326; B-277326.2; B-277326.3; B-277326.4; B-277326.5

             Date:        September 30, 1997

             Alfred J. Verdi, Esq., for the protester.
             Timothy A. Harness, for Summa Technology, Inc., and John R. Grady, for Universal
             Space Lines, the intervenors.
             Vincent A. Salgado, Esq., and Louis R. Durnya, Esq., National Aeronautics & Space
             Administration, for the agency.
             Christina Sklarew, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Where protester's proposal under broad agency announcement failed to include
             sufficient technical information to establish viability of proposed research, agency
             reasonably determined that technical success was improbable and properly
             determined not to fund proposal.
             DECISION

             Microcosm, Inc. protests the National Aeronautics & Space Administration's (NASA)
             evaluation and rejection of its proposal under NASA research announcement (NRA)
             8-19, issued for low-cost earth-to-orbit transportation systems research proposals.
             Microcosm alleges that NASA failed to evaluate the protester's proposal fairly, failed
             to communicate with the protester regarding certain aspects of its proposal, relaxed
             certain of the NRA requirements for the awardees, and used competitive
             procurement evaluation procedures which were not appropriate for NRAs.

             We deny the protest.

             This procurement was conducted under NASA's Broad Agency Announcement
             (BAA) authority contained in NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
             (NFARS) § 1835.016-70. A BAA is a contracting method by which government
             agencies can acquire basic and applied research. BAAs may be used by agencies to
             fulfill requirements for scientific study and experimentation directed toward
             advancing the state of the art or increasing knowledge or understanding rather than
             focusing on a specific system or hardware solution. A BAA is considered a
             competitive procedure and meets the requirements for full and open competition if

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most