About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277273 1 (1997-09-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagbs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision





             Matter of: Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc.

             File:       B-277273

             Date:        September 24, 1997

             David M. Nadler, Esq., and Tina M. Ducharme, Esq., Dickstein Shapiro Morin &
             Oshinsky, LLP, for the protester.
             Jerry Ann Foster, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency.
             Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency reasonably downgraded protester's proposal significantly under experience
             and past performance factor where only one of four references identified in
             proposal responded to agency's inquiry; that reference was from protester's parent
             company, leading agency to question its impartiality; and protester failed to include
             information in proposal showing work performed under that contract was similar to
             work under the solicitation.
             DECISION

             Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. protests the elimination of its proposal from
             the competitive range under General Services Administration (GSA) solicitation
             No. GS-07P-97-HXC-0007, for commercial facilities management services at four
             federal buildings in Texas.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP indicated that the awardee would be selected on a best value basis
             considering two technical factors--staffing and work schedules (with three
             subfactors), and experience and past performance--and cost (less important than
             technical). Eleven offers were received and were evaluated with scores ranging
             from 2.3 to 8.7 (on a 10-point scale). GSA determined that the three top-rated
             offers--with scores of 8.7, 8.1, and 8.0--were significantly superior to the others (the
             next highest-ranked offer received 5.9 points) and should be included in the
             competitive range. Consolidated's proposal was ranked tenth, with a score of 3.5.
             Consolidated's score reflected a finding of deficiencies in the experience and past
             performance factor and the operation, maintenance, repair, and supervisory staff
             subfac to r.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most