About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277163 1 (1997-09-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagbc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Chek F. Tan & Company

             File:       B-277163

             Date:       September 8, 1997

             Laurence P. Lubka, Esq., Hunt, Ortmann, Blasco, Palffy & Rossell, Inc., for the
             protester.
             John J. Finnerty for International Management, Development, and Training, Inc., an
             interveno r.
             Bernard Roan, Esq., and Thomas W. Berndt, Esq., National Aeronautics & Space
             Administration, for the agency.
             Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Contracting officer reasonably selected for award the proposal with a higher
             technical rating and higher evaluated cost where she determined that the proposal's
             technical advantages justified the payment of an evaluated cost premium, and the
             solicitation's evaluation scheme provided that the mission suitability evaluation
             factor and an offeror's evaluated cost were most important and that an offeror's
             relevant experience and past performance was somewhat less important in selecting
             the most advantageous proposal to the government.
             DECISION

             Chek F. Tan & Company protests the award of a contract to International
             Management, Development, and Training, Inc. (IMDT) under request for proposals
             (RFP) No. 2-35974(TLS), issued by the Ames Research Center, National
             Aeronautics & Space Administration, for financial and accounting services. The
             protester challenges the evaluation of its proposal and the award to a higher
             technically rated, higher evaluated cost offeror.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP was issued on November 26, 1996, and contemplated the award of a
             cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for the base period and four 1-year option periods to the
             offeror whose proposal was determined most advantageous to the government,
             mission suitability, cost, and relevant experience and past performance considered.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most