About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-277160 1 (1997-07-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptagbb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: JEOL USA, Inc.

             File:       B-277160

             Date:       July 2, 1997

             Janice D. Sogard for the protester.
             Vincent A. Salgado, Esq., and Jerald J. Kennemuth, Esq., National Aeronautics and
             Space Administration, for the agency.
             Henry J. Gorczycki, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency reasonably rejected as technically unacceptable a proposal for an electron
             microscope where the solicitation required the submission of descriptive literature
             to demonstrate compliance with the stated requirements, and the information
             provided by the protester prior to award did not show that its proposed microscope
             satisfied the working distance requirement stated in the solicitation.
             DECISION

             JEOL USA, Inc. protests an award to Hitachi Scientific Instruments under request
             for offers (RFO) No. RFO3-072251, issued by the National Aeronautics and Space
             Administration (NASA), Lewis Research Center, for a field emission scanning
             electron microscope. JEOL protests that the rejection of its offer as technically
             unacceptable was unreasonable.

             We deny the protest.1

             The solicitation, issued on May 5, 1997, contemplated the award of a fixed-price
             contract.2 The solicitation required offerors to provide:

                   a description (including manufacturer, brand, and model no.) in
                   sufficient detail to show that the product or service offered meets the
                   Government's requirement included in the attached model contract.



             'This protest was developed, and this decision is being issued, pursuant to an
             accelerated schedule. 4 C.F.R. § 21.10(e) (1997).

             2Award was to be based on a best value evaluation plan with technical and past
             performance factors combined being substantially equal to price.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most