About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-276487.2 1 (1997-06-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafyq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548
Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                        A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                        and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                        version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                        involved for public release.


Matter of: GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, Inc.

File:        B-276487.2

Date:        June 30, 1997

Rand L. Allen, Esq., Paul F. Khoury, Esq., David A. Vogel, Esq., and R. Paul Margie,
Jr., Esq., Wiley, Rein & Fielding, and Michael W. Clancy, Esq., for the protester.
C. Stanley Dees, Esq., Thomas C. Papson, Esq., Patrick K O'Keefe, Esq., and
Stephen E. Ruscus, Esq., McKenna & Cuneo, and Steven W. DeGeorge, Esq., for
AT&T Corporation, an intervenor.
H. Jack Shearer, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency.
Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. In a negotiated procurement for telecommunications services where the
solicitation established detailed functional performance specifications and a page
limitation for technical proposals, the procuring agency reasonably determined the
compliance of the awardee's (and protester's) proposals based in part upon the
firms' promises of compliance with more than 1,300 performance requirements and
evidence of technical capability or feasibility.

2. Lower-level evaluators' assessment of significant risk of delay in meeting
schedule requirements did not demonstrate that the awardee would not satisfy
these requirements, where the source selection official reasonably found that the
awardee had committed to, and was capable of, satisfying the schedule
requirements.

3. Where price is stated to be more important than the technical and management
evaluation factors, the agency's judgment that the awardee's substantial price
advantage outweighed the protester's acknowledged technical superiority, primarily
in the area of evaluated schedule risk, was reasonable and in accord with the award
evaluation criteria.
DECISION

GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, Inc. protests the award of a contract to AT&T
Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. DCA300-96-R-0001, issued by the
Defense Information Technology Contracting Organization, Defense Information

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most