About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275818 1 (1997-03-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafvt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: EBA Engineering, Inc.

             File:       B-275818

             Date:       March 31, 1997

             Robert G. Fryling, Esq., and Edward J. Hoffman, Esq., Blank, Rome, Comisky &
             McCauley, for the protester.
             J. Patrick McMahon, Esq., and Kenneth D. Brody, Esq., McMahon, David & Brody,
             for Soil and Land Use Technology, Inc., an intervenor.
             Beverly M. Russell, Esq., Federal Highway Administration, Department of
             Transportation, for the agency.
             Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Composition of technical evaluation panel is within the discretion of the agency,
             and where protester has not shown actual bias on the part of particular evaluators
             there is no basis to question the composition of the panel.

             2. Allegation of bait and switch of proposed key personnel is denied where there
             is no evidence of misrepresentation by awardee, solicitation provided for
             substitution of key personnel, and of ten proposed key personnel, all but two are
             available or performing.

             3. Contracting officer's determination that offeror's firm, fixed-price proposal is
             reasonable is unobjectionable where it is based on a price analysis that includes
             comparison of direct and indirect rates with other offerors and other agency
             contracts for similar services, which reasonably supports contracting officer's
             conclusion.

             4. Source selection official's (SSO) decision to raise offeror's technical standing is
             unobjectionable since SSO is not bound by the recommendations and conclusions of
             working level evaluators and SSO's decision is reasonable.
             DECISION

             EBA Engineering, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Soil and Land Use
             Technology, Inc. (SaLUT) under request for proposals (RFP) No. DTFH61-96-R-
             00050, issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
             Transportation, for laboratory support services. EBA contends that the evaluation


21241

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most