About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275803 1 (1997-03-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafvq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to a I
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This version has been approved
                                                     for public release.



             Matter of: Dorris, Helen, and William McMurtry

             File:        B-275803; B-275803.2

             Date:        March 31, 1997

             Mark S. Sifferman, Esq., Norling, Kolsrud, Sifferman, Svejda & Davis, for the
             protester.
             Thomas A. McCarville, Esq., for McCarville, Cooper & Vasquez, an intervenor.
             Emily C. Hewitt, Esq., Donald R. Jayne, Esq., and Marilyn M. Paik, Esq., General
             Services Administration, for the agency.
             Henry J. Gorczycki, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. The issuance of an unsigned lease document by a contracting officer to an
             offeror does not constitute an award of a contract to that offeror where the letter
             accompanying the lease clearly indicates that no contract will arise unless the
             government signs the lease and the government never signed the lease.

             2. An agency properly reopened discussions to address existing proposal
             deficiencies with, and obtain proposal revisions from, all offerors in the competition
             where no proposal is acceptable under the solicitation and eligible for award, and
             the solicitation has been amended in a material manner; under such circumstances,
             there is no improper technical leveling in reopening discussions.

             3. Where a solicitation for leased space defines a late proposal as one received
             after the due date for submission of best and final offers (BAFO), a protest alleging
             that a proposal is late if received after the date for submission of initial proposals,
             but before the BAFO date, constitutes a protest based upon an alleged impropriety
             in a solicitation apparent prior to the time set for receipt of initial proposals, which
             is untimely if not filed prior to the time set for receipt of initial proposals.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most