About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275389 1 (1997-02-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafuh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: USA Electronics

             File:       B-275389

             Date:       February 14, 1997

             Paul D. Anderson, for the protester.
             Benjamin G. Perkins, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
             Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency selection of higher-priced offeror with a better delivery performance record
             instead of a lower-priced offeror, whose performance reflected delivery
             delinquencies, was reasonable and consistent with solicitation's evaluation scheme,
             which weighed past performance and price equally, where there was a low
             inventory of the solicited item and the agency reasonably concluded that the
             awardee's better performance record indicated a lower delivery risk.
             DECISION

             USA Electronics protests the award of a contract to Revere Electric Supply Co.
             under request for proposals (RFP) No. SP0430-96-R-2603, issued by the Defense
             Supply Center Richmond (DSCR), Defense Logistics Agency, for up to 2,000 power
             inverters.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP, issued on August 6, 1996, contemplated a best value award based upon a
             comparative assessment of prices and past performance, which were equally
             weighted. Award was to be made to the offeror with the lowest price and best past
             performance score unless the offeror with the best performance history did not
             offer the lowest price, in which case the government would determine the
             appropriate tradeoff of price for past performance. Among other things, the RFP
             stated that delivery schedule/inventory status and historical delivery/quality
             problems could affect the tradeoff determination.

             The RFP included a clause advising offerors that past performance would be
             evaluated based upon an automated best value model (ABVM) score, which was to
             be calculated for each DSCR vendor on a monthly basis. The clause stated that the
             monthly ABVM score would be made available to each vendor on the electronic


419214

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most