About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275079 1 (1997-01-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaftj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision





             Matter of: CHI Fabrication Services

             File:       B-275079

             Date:       January 22, 1997

             Timothy E. Heffernan, Esq., Watt, Tieder & Hoffar, for the protester.
             Alex D. Tomaszczuk, Esq., and Devon E. Hewitt, Esq., Shaw Pittman Potts &
             Trowbridge, an intervenor.
             Cecilia R. Jones, Esq., and Alden Abbott, Esq., Department of Commerce, for the
             agency.
             Marie Penny Ahearn, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Agency properly rejected protester's proposal as technically unacceptable where
             solicitation required offerors to submit drawings and data to establish that offered
             item met design requirements, and protester's drawings and accompanying
             description did not indicate that all requirements were met.
             DECISION

             CHI Fabrication Services (CHI) protests the award of a contract to General
             Scientific Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. 52-PAPT-6-00009,
             issued by the Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, for the
             design and fabrication of file/mail carts. The protester challenges the evaluation of
             technical proposals.

             We deny the protest.

             The solicitation contemplated the award of a fixed-price, indefinite-quantity contract
             for a base year, with four 1-year option periods, to provide a minimum of 5 and a
             maximum of 300 carts. It included required dimensions, materials, and features of
             the cart, but left it to offerors to propose viable configurations. The solicitation
             included a rough drawing of what the cart to be proposed should resemble and
             instructed offerors to provide all necessary drawings and data that will assure the
             functional features have been met, as well as a bill of materials of all components
             which discloses the type and grade of materials and that they meet structural and
             design constraints as set forth. Generally, the solicitation required the cart to have
             the minimum dimensions of 51 inches height, 19 inches depth and 40 inches width,


610122

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most