About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-274776.2 1 (1997-01-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafrg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Hedgecock Electric, Inc.

             File:       B-274776.2

             Date:       January 31, 1997

             Jesse W. Rigby, Esq., Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond, Stackhouse & Stone, for
             the protester.
             Sandra M. Wozniak, John E. Lariccia, Esq., and Marian E. Sullivan, Esq., Department
             of the Air Force, for the agency.
             Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
             GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Low bid was properly rejected as nonresponsive where its certificate of
             procurement integrity identified one person as the certifier but a different person
             signed the certifier's name on the certificate; the manner of execution of the
             certificate creates doubt about whether one individual representative of the bidder
             has made an unequivocal commitment to satisfy the substantial legal obligations
             imposed by the certificate.
             DECISION

             Hedgecock Electric, Inc. protests the rejection of its bid and the award of a
             contract to Overstreet Electric Company under invitation for bids (IFB) No. F33601-
             96-B-9009, issued by the Department of the Air Force for electrical work at
             Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Hedgecock's bid was rejected because the
             individual designated as the certifier on the certificate of procurement integrity did
             not personally sign that document.

             We deny the protest.

             The IFB, issued July 15, 1996, required bidders to submit the standard bid form (SF)
             1442 and a bid bond. Additionally, because the contract was expected to exceed
             $100,000, the IFB, pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 3.104-10(a),
             contained the standard certificate of procurement integrity clause found at FAR
             § 52.203-8. That clause implements section 27(e) of the Office of Federal
             Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act, 41 U.S.C. § 423(e) (1994), which precludes federal
             agencies from awarding a contract to a firm unless the officer or employee
             responsible for preparing the offer or bid certifies in writing that neither he nor
             those employees who participated in preparing the bid has any information


950131

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most