About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-274110.2 1 (1997-05-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafqj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: The Leader Mortgage Company

             File:       B-274110.2

             Date:       May 19, 1997

             Howard M. Metzenbaum, Esq., for the protester.
             Merilee D. Rosenberg, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
             Jennifer D. Westfall-Mc Grail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
             General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protester was not entitled to award merely because it submitted lowest-priced,
             technically acceptable offer where solicitation did not provide for award on that
             basis.

             2. Selection of higher-rated, higher-priced offer was consistent with solicitation
             scoring scheme allocating only 10 percent of evaluation points to price.

             3. Protest of solicitation scoring scheme is untimely where scoring scheme was
             announced in solicitation, but protester did not object to it prior to closing time for
             receipt of proposals.
             DECISION

             The Leader Mortgage Company protests the award of a contract to Computer Data
             Systems, Inc. (CDSI) under request for proposals (RFP) No. 101-36-96, issued by the
             Department of Veterans Affairs for mortgage services. Leader argues that it should
             have received the award because its price was considerably lower than CDSrs.

             We deny the protest.

             The RFP provided for the evaluation of proposals on the basis of technical factors,
             past performance, and price, with award of a fixed-price, time-and-materials
             contract to be made to the offeror whose proposal was determined to be in the best
             interest of the government. Technical evaluation factors included corporate
             experience and management approach; approach to performing the services;
             organizational qualifications; personnel; and facilities and equipment. Price was to
             be scored by dividing the lowest offered price by the offeror's price and multiplying
             the resulting fraction by the maximum points available (i.e., 10). Offerors were
             advised that the technical factors would be worth 65 percent of the evaluation


1102421

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most