About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-275163 1 (1996-12-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaeni0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Sabreliner Corporation

             File:       B-275163; B-275163.2; B-275163.3

             Date:       December 31, 1996

             Kenneth B. Weckstein, Esq., and Janine S. Benton, Esq., Epstein, Becker & Green,
             for the protester.
             Lisa V. Gressel, Esq., for General Electric Company, an intervenor.
             Clarence D. Long III, Esq., and John E. Lariccia, Esq., Department of the Air Force,
             for the agency.
             Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
             participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             Solicitation for overhaul of Air Force-owned aircraft engines, for which replacement
             parts are furnished by the government, is properly considered by the agency to be
             contract for services to which Buy American Act does not apply.
             DECISION

             Sabreliner Corporation protests the specifications in request for proposals (RFP)
             No. F41608-96-R-49674, issued by the Department of the Air Force for overhaul and
             repair services on the J85 aircraft engine and management items subject to repair
             associated with the engine. Sabreliner argues that the Buy American Act (BAA)
             (41 U.S.C. § 10a (1994)) applies to this requirement and that offers should be
             evaluated giving preference to American-made end products.1

             We deny the protest.



             'At the request of Sabreliner, the Air Force has amended the RFP more than once in
             an effort to ensure that all necessary clauses are included and that all clauses are
             consistent with the type of contract to be awarded. In addition to the BAA,
             Sabreliner has argued that a number of other clauses should have been included in
             the RFP. However, in a telephone conference with the parties on November 6,
             1996, counsel to Sabreliner conceded that inclusion of these other clauses is not
             necessary; the crux of Sabreliner's protest is the issue of the applicability of the
             BAA. Accordingly, we will not address whether the additional clauses were
             properly excluded by the Air Force.


437129

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most