About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-272414.7 1 (1996-12-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaejb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision




             Matter of: Canon USA, Inc.; Minolta Corporation

             File:       B-272414.7; B-272414.8; B-274628; B-274628.2

             Date:       December 20, 1996

             Andrew Mohr, Esq., Cohen & White, for Canon USA, Inc., and Robert Brams, Esq.,
             and Michael Schaengold, Esq., Patton Boggs LLP, for Minolta Corporation, the
             pro testers.
             Trisa J. Thompson, Esq., and G. Matthew Koehl, Esq., Seyfarth, Shaw,
             Fairweather & Geraldson, and Harry Orenstein, Esq., for Xerox Corporation, an
             interveno r.
             Turhan Robinson, Esq., and Marie Adamson Collins, Esq., General Services
             Administration, for the agency.
             Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq, and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
             Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Dismissal of protests as academic is affirmed where the corrective action
             provided by the contracting agency prior to the filing of the agency's report on the
             protests is the maximum relief that the General Accounting Office would have
             provided had a decision been issued finding the protests have merit; protesters are
             not entitled to reimbursement of the costs of filing and pursuing the protests where
             the agency timely implemented its promised corrective action.

             2. Protest that a modification to a firm's multiple award schedule contract exceeds
             the scope of the contract and is an unjustified sole source procurement is academic
             where the modification was rescinded within two weeks of the date on which the
             protests were filed, and prior to the modification's effective date, ordering agencies
             were advised that equipment could not be ordered pursuant to that modification.
             DECISION

             Canon USA, Inc. and Minolta Corporation request reconsideration of our dismissal
             of their protests of the award of delivery orders to Xerox Corporation by the United
             States Army Information Systems Command (USAISC) and the General Services
             Administration (GSA) under contract No. DAE32-94-D-0004 (0004), for the rental
             and maintenance of photocopier equipment. Canon and Minolta also protest GSA's
             issuance of modification No. 49 to Xerox under its Federal Supply Contract
             Group 36, Part IV Schedule Contract No. GS-26F-1001B (1001B) for photocopier
             equipment, maintenance, and services, to allow federal agencies to convert


12151219

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most