About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-272261 1 (1996-09-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaeik0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release.


Matter of: Research Analysis and Maintenance, Inc.

File:        B-272261; B-272261.2

Date:        September 18, 1996

William L. Walsh, Jr., Esq., J. Scott Hommer III, Esq., Win. Craig Dubishar, Esq., and
Paul N. Wengert, Esq., Venable, Baetjer and Howard, for the protester.
Gerard F. Doyle, Esq., Alexander T. Bakos, Esq., Doyle and Bachman, an intervenor.
Jeffrey I. Kessler, Esq., and Gary Theodore, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
agency.
Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. In a negotiated procurement for computer system and software engineering
support services, protest that the contracting agency was required to consider
Capability Maturity Model software process assessments under various technical
evaluation factors is denied where the solicitation only provided for the use of the
Capability Maturity Model in the evaluation of proposals under one evaluation
subfactor.

2. Protest that the contracting agency misapplied the Capability Maturity Model in
assessing the protester's and awardee's software process risk is denied where the
protester merely disagrees with the agency's risk assessment and does not show the
agency's judgment to be unreasonable.

3. In a procurement for the award of a time-and-materials contract with fixed-price
burdened labor rates, the contracting officer reasonably evaluated the realism of the
offerors' proposed labor rates, in accordance with the solicitation, where the agency
assessed the offerors' ability to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel during
the contract at the proposed rates.

4. The contracting agency did not coerce or mislead the protester into raising its
proposed labor rates, where the agency was reasonably concerned with the
protester's ability to hire and retain qualified personnel due to its low proposed
labor rates and asked the protester during discussions to substantiate how it
intended to hire and retain qualified personnel at the rates proposed; the protester's


354101

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most