About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-272182 1 (1996-09-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaeia0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release.


Matter of: Heimann Systems, Inc.

File:        B-272182

Date:        September 9, 1996

Sam Zalman Gdanski, Esq., for the protester.
Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Rand L. Allen, Esq., and Mark H. Neblett, Esq., Wiley, Rein &
Fielding, for EG&G Astrophysics Research Corporation, an intervenor.
Joni M. Gibson, Esq., Department of Justice, for the agency.
Jeanne W. Isrin, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that evaluation of technical and price proposals was improper is denied
where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the
solicitation's evaluation criteria.

2. Use of price scoring formula in the evaluation of proposals is not objectionable
merely because the solicitation did not inform offerors that the formula would be
used.
DECISION

Heimann Systems, Inc. protests the award of a contract to EG&G Astrophysics
Research Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. MS-96-R-0006, issued
by the United States Marshals Service (USMS), Department of Justice, for the
acquisition and installation of x-ray security screening systems.

We deny the protest.

The RFP contemplated award of a fixed-price, indefinite quantity, indefinite delivery
contract for 1 base year, with four 1-year options. Offerors were required to submit
technical and price proposals, plus a sample x-ray screening unit for testing and
evaluation. The technical proposals and samples were to be evaluated under the
following criteria: meeting specifications (60 of 100 available points); degree to
which system's performance and features exceed specifications, especially
resolution and penetration (20 points); execution plan, resumes, corporate
overview, and corporate references (10 points); and past performance (10 points).


417920

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most