About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-272069 1 (1996-09-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaehk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: Lewis Machine & Tool Co.

File:       B-272069

Date:       September 6, 1996

Alan M. Grayson, Esq., and Victor A. Kubli, Esq., Law Offices of Alan M. Grayson,
for the protester.
Daniel C. Sauls, Esq., Jerald S. Howe, Jr., Esq., and Paul R. Hurst,
Steptoe & Johnson, for United Defense Limited Partnership, an intervenor.
Richard A. Couch, Esq., and Vera Meza, Esq., Department of the Army, for the
agency.
Adam Vodraska, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Under a solicitation for a prototype lightweight howitzer, the protester's proposal,
premised on a prototype developed and fabricated by an Army arsenal and provided
under a subcontract to the protester, could not be accepted because the
subcontract was not authorized by 10 U.S.C. § 2208(j), which permits
subcontracting by arsenals only where they can compete directly under the
solicitation with private firms, which this solicitation did not permit.
DECISION

Lewis Machine & Tool Co. protests the decision by the Army Tank-Automotive and
Armaments Command, Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center,
Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, to eliminate Lewis from the competition under
request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAE30-96-R-0003 for a contract to participate in
the shoot-off phase of the development of a lightweight 155 millimeter (mm)
howitzer. This RFP contemplated the award of fixed-priced contracts to all
acceptable offerors for the shoot-off, the first phase in the acquisition of a
lightweight 155 mm howitzer to replace aging and heavier howitzers currently in use
by the Army and Marine Corps.

We deny the protest.

The RFP required offerors to deliver a single prototype howitzer, as well as related
equipment, technical and other specified documentation, and a support team, to
Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona by April 25, 1996. Agency personnel then
performed an initial screening of the proposed howitzers for compliance with the


51696

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most