About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-271119 1 (1996-06-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaecy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Comptroller General of the United States Washington, D.C. 20548 Decision Matter of: All Star Maintenance, Inc. File: B-271119 Date: June 17, 1996 David W. Croysdale, Esq., and Mitchell W. Quick, Esq., Michael, Best & Friedrich, for the protester. Benjamin N. Thompson, Esq., Thompson & Godwin, for Eastern Maintenance & Services, Inc., an intervenor. Stephen T. Orsino, Esq., Diane D. Hayden, Esq., and George N. Brezna, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. Tania L. Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest that contracting agency's evaluation of offerors' proposals was unreasonable is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's evaluation criteria. DECISION All Star Maintenance, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Eastern Maintenance & Services, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. N62477-95-R- 0099, issued by the Department of the Navy for base family housing maintenance at the Naval Air Station in Patuxent River, Maryland. All Star argues that the Navy's evaluation of the offerors' proposals and its subsequent best value determination were unreasonable. We deny the protest. The solicitation, issued August 18, 1995, anticipated the award of a combination fixed-price, indefinite quantity contract to be performed over 1 base year, with up to 4 option years. The maintenance and repair of the 790 family housing units and real property at issue includes change of occupancy work, service calls, janitorial services, painting, appliance replacement, grounds maintenance, and pest control services. Award would be made to the offeror whose proposal was the most advantageous to the government, considering three equally important evaluation criteria: technical/management, past performance, and price. The technical/management criterion consisted of three equally important factors: staffing, method of operation, and relevant experience. The past performance 40067

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most