About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-271065 1 (1996-06-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaecp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                 DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                        A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                        and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                        version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                        involved for public release.


Matter of: Theta Engineering, Inc.

File:        B-271065; B-271065.2

Date:        June 12, 1996

Thomas B. Archbold, Esq., Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., for the protester.
Gerald T. Nielsen, Esq., Thomas F. Williamson, Esq., and Marcia G. Madsen, Esq.,
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for Engineering/Documentation Systems, Inc., an
intervenor.
Colonel Nicholas P. Retson and Major Michael J. O'Farrell, Jr., Department of the
Army, for the agency.
Andrew T. Pogany, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest that agency misevaluated cost proposals by upwardly adjusting
protester's proposed costs and conversely failing to upwardly adjust awardee's
proposed cost in certain cost elements, with result that the protester's cost was
higher than the awardee's is denied, where upward adjustment of protester's cost
was reasonable in two challenged areas, and other adjustments in the protester's or
awardee's cost proposal would not displace awardee as the low offeror.

2. Where protester fails to show that its proposal was technically superior to
awardee's proposal--and even assuming the protester's argument to be valid that its
technical proposal should have been rated technically equal to awardee's technical
proposal--cost properly became the important factor for selection, and protester was
not entitled to the award because its evaluated cost was not low.
DECISION

Theta Engineering, Inc., the incumbent contractor, protests the award of a cost-plus-
base/award fee contract to Engineering/Documentation Systems, Inc. (EDSI) under
request for proposal (RFP) No. DAKF36-95-R-0002, issued by the Department of the
Army, Fort Drum, New York for direct support and general support (DS/GS)
maintenance services and repair of commercial and tactical equipment in various
commodity groups at several military facilities. Theta principally challenges the
evaluation of cost and technical proposals.


218710

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most