About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-270397.2 1 (1996-05-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadym0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


oComptroller General
             of the United States
             Washington, D.C. 20548
             Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

                                                      A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                                      and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                                      version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                                      involved for public release.


             Matter of: The Futures Group International

             File:        B-270397.2

             Date:        May 16, 1996

             Paul Shnitzer, Esq., and Mark D. Taylor, Esq., Crowell & Moring, for the protester.
             Alan A. Pemberton Esq., Covington & Burling, for Management Sciences for Health,
             an intervenor.
             Anna Chytla, Esq., Agency for International Development, for the agency.
             Jerold D. Cohen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the
             preparation of the decision.
             DIGEST

             1. Protest that a particular type of experience on the part of an offeror's key
             contract employee was a prerequisite for award is denied where the solicitation did
             not mandate such experience and where, contrary to the protester's arguments, the
             agency's actions during negotiations should not have led the protester to conclude
             that such experience was mandatory and to structure its offer accordingly.

             2. Protest that solicitation funding requirement and related cost evaluation criterion
             were unfair is dismissed as untimely since it concerns apparent solicitation
             improprieties that should have been protested before proposals were due.

             3. Protest that agency did not adequately justify selection of higher cost offeror is
             denied where such offeror overall received a higher evaluated cost score than did
             the protester; technical considerations were worth four times as much as cost
             considerations and the awardee's technical score was better than the protester's;
             and the selection official reasonably determined that acceptance of the higher cost
             offer was warranted given its technical advantages particularly with respect to the
             offeror's proposed key contract employee.
             DECISION

             The Futures Group International (TFGI) protests the award of a contract to
             Management Sciences for Health (MSH) under request for proposals (RFP) No. 521-
             95-005, issued by the Agency for International Development (AID). The solicitation
             sought offers for a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to implement the Health Systems
             (HS) 2004 Project in Haiti. TFGI protests that the awardee's Chief of Party (COP)


337414

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most