About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-270012.4 1 (1996-10-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadvx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release.


Matter of. Ogden Support Services, Inc.

File:        B-270012.4

Date:        October 3, 1996

Ronald K. Henry, Esq., and Mark A. Riordan, Esq., Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays &
Handler, for the protester.
Dennis J. Riley, Esq, and Joseph G. Billings, Esq., Riley & Artabane, P.C., an
intervenor.
Diane Florkowski, Esq., Central Intelligence Agency, for the agency.
Charles W. Morrow, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Agency had no reasonable basis to give a near perfect score for past performance
to the proposal of the awardee of a contract for mail courier services where the
record reflects the awardee had limited past performance in this area while the
protester's proposal, with clearly superior past performance, was given only a
slightly higher score.
DECISION

Ogden Support Services, Inc. protests the award of a contract to American Systems
Corporation (ASC) under request for proposals (RFP) No. 95-W001, issued by the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Office of Information Technology, for mail and
courier services.

We sustain the protest.

This award was the subject of our decision in Ogden Support Servs., Inc.,
B-270012.2, Mar. 19, 1996, 96-1 CPD  177, in which we sustained Ogden's protest
against the award to ASC on the basis that the high evaluation rating of ASC's past
performance was unsupported and thus the determination that ASC's and Ogden's
proposals were technically equal, upon which the selection of ASC's lower
evaluated cost proposal was based, was not justified. Specifically, we found that
the record contained insufficient information and analysis justifying ASC's near
perfect rating for past performance because ASC's proposal reflected only limited
experience in mail and courier and/or similar administrative support services.


533109

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most