About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-266249 1 (1996-11-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadux0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




G   AO          United States
                General Accounting Office
                Washington, D.C. 20548

                Office of the General Counsel




                B-266249


                November 14, 1996



                Mr. Edwin A. Verburg
                Deputy Chief Financial Officer
                Department of the Treasury

                Dear Mr. Verburg:

                This responds to your letter of September 15, 1995, requesting relief from liability
                for certifying officer Carol Phillips and Mr. Thomas M. Quinn, her supervisor at the
                Andover Service Center of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), for a loss arising
                from the payment of an erroneous tax refund in the amount of $3,503. Due to the
                expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, we are returning this case to you
                without action.

                Certifying officers are generally responsible for the existence and correctness of the
                facts stated in the certificate, voucher, and supporting documentation; the
                correctness of the computations on the voucher; and the legality of the proposed
                payment under the appropriation or fund involved. Moreover, they are pecuniarily
                liable to the United States, automatically and strictly, for any illegal, improper, or
                incorrect payment that results from a false or misleading certification, or which is
                prohibited by law or does not represent a legal obligation under the appropriation
                or fund so used. 31 U.S.C. § 3528(a). At the same time, this Office is authorized to
                relieve a certifying officer from liability when we find that (1) the certification was
                based on official records and the certifying officer did not know, and by reasonable
                diligence and inquiry could not have discovered, the correct information; or (2) in
                the context of payments under contracts, the contractual obligation was incurred in
                good faith, no law specifically prohibited the payment, and the United States
                received value for the payment. 31 U.S.C. § 3528(b).

                Recently, we advised you concerning when and how to refer requests for relief of
                IRS certifying officers under section 3528(b) for losses arising from erroneous tax
                refunds. B-266245, Oct. 24, 1996 (copy enclosed). In that case, we noted that the
                Internal Revenue Code and IRS policy require IRS certifying officers to initially
                assess taxes and certify and pay refunds based upon the representations contained
                in the taxpayer's return, subject to later adjustment and collection of any refunds
                found erroneous. We explained that while IRS certifying officers are generally

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most