About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-266165.2 1 (1996-02-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptadui0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision                                   DECISION FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                         A protected decision was issued on the date below
                                         and was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This
                                         version has been redacted or approved by the parties
                                         involved for public release.


Matter of: EC Corporation

File:        B-266165.2

Date:        February 20, 1996

Paul F. Khoury, Esq., David A. Vogel, Esq., Philip J. Davis., Esq., and Phillip H.
Harrington, Esq., Wiley, Rein & Fielding, for the protester.
Donna Lee Yesner, Esq., Carl L. Vacketta, Esq., and Chandra Emery, Esq., Piper &
Marbury, for Tate Facilities Services, Inc., an interested party.
Christopher M. Bellomy, Esq., Robert M. Roylance, Esq., and Cynthia S. Guill, Esq.,
Dept. of the Navy, for the agency.
Jeanne W. Isrin, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Agency's failure to downgrade awardee's proposal for lack of understanding based
on price realism analysis that initially found unrealistically low item prices was
reasonable where agency determined that awardee's technical proposal, together
with its responses to discussion questions concerning the low prices, demonstrated
an acceptable level of understanding.
DECISION

EC Corporation protests the award of a contract to Tate Facilities Services, Inc.
under request for proposals (RFP) No. N62470-95-R-1151, issued by the Navy for
base operating services at the Naval Security Group Activity, Northwest, and its
military family housing complex, in Chesapeake, Virginia.

We deny the protest.

The RFP contemplated award of a fixed-price, indefinite quantity (with award fee)
contract for a base period with 4 option years. The work to be performed was
specified in approximately 224 sub-contract line items (CLIN); 167 were described
as fixed-price and 57 were described as indefinite quantity. Section B of the RFP
contained a pricing schedule that required, for the base and each option year, a
single price for the fixed-price work, and unit and extended prices for each line
item of indefinite quantity work. Estimated requirements were provided for the
indefinite quantity items, so that total prices could be computed.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most